I’ve answered the question:
Our’n
1.) I have a moral obligation to my own people to publicize the issue. Blacks and Hispanics complain about their depiction in the media. They complain about their treatment in our history books. They have complained about dying in foreign wars that are not in their interest. I don’t see what I am doing here as any different. Whites have legitimate grievances against Jews. We should air them.
2.) Creating a prejudice against Jews. Whites are living under cultural conditions which are bringing about our dissolution as a racial group. Jews have played a leading role in creating this hostile anti-White climate. It is quasi-genocide, similar to cultural genocide, but not quite. For the most, it is not a “top down thing,” but the cumulative effect of the “individual fire starters” is genocidal. I think Whites are justified in resenting Jews and desiring to separate from them.
They’rn
3.) I have a moral obligation to be honest and forthright. I won’t spread destructive rumors and charges that create unjustified prejudice. I will also dispel these as I come across them. I had planned to do this anyway.
4.) I have a moral obligation to deter exterminationist anti-Semitism. I will balance my coverage of the Jewish Question with posts that shore up traditional moral values. We should discuss Christian values and virtue ethics a lot more. This can be done at Occidental Dissent. Moral racialists won’t follow sociopaths down the exterminationist road.
5.) I have a moral obligation to emphasize that anti-Semitism is not an ideology. If Jews are willing to redress our grievances and acknowledge the harm they have done, as the White community has done on various issues, then we should abandon anti-Semitism.
[...] answered the following question: “Here is the major issue that we need to address: does blogging about the [...]
“4.) I have a moral obligation to deter exterminationist anti-Semitism. I will balance my coverage of the Jewish Question with posts that shore up traditional moral values. We should discuss Christian values and virtue ethics a lot more. This can be done at Occidental Dissent. Moral racialists won’t follow sociopaths down the exterminationist road.”
Good stuff and a great platform to build a movement on.
Bringing in instead of attacking racialist Christians is a good move. Jobbik in Hungary is a Christian movement as an example.
Your moving in the right direction….WN have avoided the morality issue for years. Another reason they have gotten no traction with their people.
It’s not “Christian” ethics that will deter exterminationists.
In fact, they might be the more inspired, considering that God actually encouraged genocide; read up on the early Jews slaughtering the inhabitants of cities to the last baby.
There’s no doubt in my mind that David would have loved to get all the philistine foreskins in existence, but had to settle for only 100.
Morality is not tethered to any one religion, or rather, is tethered to every single religion.
sorry that’s me, I forgot my last name.
Morality is important to the white public. 95% of people need to believe in moral obligations. But I don’t think that a leading intellectual like yourself should view himself as having mystical ‘obligations’ and ‘reasons’, which is all morality is. Compare it to religion, belief for evolutionary reasons.
“I’d prefer to minimise harm to innocent Jewish individuals, and I don’t believe that this preference conflicts irresolvably with a commitment to protecting my own kind. When these interests do conflict, it is a common problem of multiple maxima, in which I would emphasise my racial interests but without 100% priority to these interests in all circumstances”.
That’s how I would phrase my balancing of out-group and in-group interests. If I thought I had moral obligations, it would cloud my thinking for sure. This is not to say that moral language and moral appeals aren’t useful, just be above that yourself. Although Jim Giles is kinda crazy, I also think he’s right that you can’t afford to go easy on your enemies at the crucial time, particularly when they hold all the cards.
I will balance my coverage of the Jewish Question with posts that shore up traditional moral values. We should discuss Christian values and virtue ethics a lot more.
Good luck with that, HW. I mean it. A belief in Christian morality (and therefore its relation to issues of race, immigration, and the JQ) is the single biggest obstacle to WN “recruitment” among whites, in my experience. In fact, often the most devout Christians are also the most “anti-racist.” I am interested to see how you pull this off.
In my own case, a growing belief in WNism over the last 15 years concided with a weakening of interest in religion (Catholicism), which previously was quite strong. Surely this is not an isolated case?
how old are you, Hunter? Was it a metaphore when in one of your essays you said “…we were in our teens during Clinton times…” or something like that. Was it a factual statement?
I’m 29 years old. I was born in 1980.
HW,
I have appreciated your serious thought on this issue.
I think the key issue here is the place of Christianity in the WN movement.
From a theological standpoint, the multicultural Christian/pantheism that opposes our interests is a Christian heresy. I tend to agree with Paul Gottfried’s analysis of Protestant decadence in his *Multiculturalism and the Politics of Guilt*. I also recomment Kurth’s “The Protestant Deformation and American Foreign Policy.”
A virile, Western Christianity is woven through everything good in our civilization. Whether we are personally Christian or not, we need Christianity. It is part of our heritage, and we must not simply give it up to those who pervert it into marxist twaddle or a Zionist fundraising scheme.
Well thought, well said. As I had hoped, you snapped out of the shell shock and made the right call.
)
There is a difference between opposing Jews as a means to reach an end goal, as a necessary step to avoid being piled on, and opposing Jews just to oppose Jews.
Yeah of course, any right winger is going to be smeared as a nazi by angry Jews and will have to fight those accusations, but I don’t think being aware of the mindset the Jewish community has towards racialism makes one antisemitic. It just makes one realistic.
You become anti-semitic when you attempt to “polarize” like Alex Linder does.
[...] 2009 by Hunter Wallace A point in favor of the philo-Semites emerged this morning. In light of my pledge of fairness, I felt compelled to report it. Jewish attitudes toward immigration are more complex than White [...]
[...] a White American can’t be friends with a Jew. In theory, cooperation is possible. I’ve said before that we should abandon anti-Semitism if Jews were willing to redress our [...]
[...] a White American can’t be friends with a Jew. In theory, cooperation is possible. I’ve said before that we should abandon anti-Semitism if Jews were willing to redress our [...]