The leaders of Organized Jewry in the United States are concerned about the criticism they are receiving in the comment sections of major newspapers and websizes. In particular, The Huffington Post has been a target of criticism. Although the paid gatekeepers over there ruthlessly squelch every anti-Semitic comment, a distressing and unwelcome wave of anti-Jewish sentiment still manages to penetrate the Zionist firewall.
This is a useful illustration of just how seriously discourse poisoning is taken by our ideological enemies. The White community doesn’t have anything like a cohesive hierarchy of organizations charged with monitoring and policing every Europhobic comment that gets posted on the web. Jews understand that discourse controls thought which controls political action. Through their control of the media, a minority of privileged extremists are able to lord over a slumbering White majority.
As it happens, I have spent a lot of time lately reading about America in the Antebellum era. There are similarities between the ways Jews have a chokehold over the dissemination of information in our own times and the old “Slave Power” which imposed the gag rule on the Senate and censored abolitionist material in the mails. They also manipulated the status system, exploited loyalty politics, and invoked the spectre of a Haitian-style racial holocaust to stiffle criticism of the “domestic institution.”
It took the Civil War to dislodge the Slave Power from its dominance over the Southern states and the Democratic Party. What will it take to rid Congress of the more formidable Jew Power?
‘jew power’…?
Jews make up just under 2% of the American population. And if, as you wrongly suggest, Jews have so much ‘power’ why does America repeatedly refuse to recognise Jerusalem as the capital of the Jewish nation…?
Yeah – real ‘power’, that is…
As for your phrase the ‘jewish question’ – it was Hitler and the Nazis who introduced this phrase. It does not speak well of you that you are happy to repeat it.
You’re in the wrong place if you expect people here to be fooled by the 2% number. While Jews are 2% of Americans, they are almost 50% of billionaires and 20% of millionaires. They are the wealthiest ethnic group in America.
The JTA article acknowledges that Jews control The Huff Post: they are sufficiently powerful enough to ensure that anti-Semitic comments are deleted at that website and most others like it. This is why White Nationalists are always complaining about Jewish media control.
You are also knocking over a straw man of Jewish Power. While the Israelis haven’t gotten everything they want, the Jew Power in America still exercises substantial control over U.S. Middle East foreign policy.
The term “Jewish Question” predates the rise of the Third Reich. In the United States, Henry Ford and Henry Adams were critics of Jewish influence long before the rise of the NSDAP.
The Nazis were the first to ban smoking. They were the first regime to take environmentalism seriously. The left doesn’t care when their policies align with “Nazi firsts,” so why should we?
The left: it’s all about “who? Whom?”
The Jews are constantly bitching about the comment section of the Guardian. They even set up a site called CIF watch to monitor it. Jews can’t stand Whites having an opinion about them and their actions unless they have the power to press the delete button.
The typical jewish response to any criticism of their influence is to complain about what they don’t control.
“As for your phrase the ‘jewish question’ – it was Hitler and the Nazis who introduced this phrase. It does not speak well of you that you are happy to repeat it.”
In fact, the term “Jewish Question” has appeared as early as the 1840s, and was subsequently generally accepted as a term for cultural problems related to Jewish emancipation by all those concerned, including the Zionist movement founders. Among those known to use it in their writings were Bruno Bauer, Karl Marx or Theodor Herzl. The latter famously said “The Jewish Question exists. It would be foolish to deny it.” The canonical work of Zionism, Herzl’s “The Jewish State” was subtitled: “A modern solution to the Jewish question.”
Jew With A View:”As for your phrase the ‘jewish question’ – it was Hitler and the Nazis who introduced this phrase. It does not speak well of you that you are happy to repeat it.”
No, Hitler and the German National Socialists did not invent the phrase ‘Jewish Question’ — do some basic research for Christ’s sake (just a friggin Google search would suffice).
Wikipedia tells us: “An early use of the expression “Jewish question” appeared during the Jew Bill of 1753 debates in England.[4] According to Otto Dov Kulka[5] of Hebrew University, the term became widespread in the 19th century when it was used in discussions about Jewish emancipation in Germany (Judenfrage).[4]” – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Question#Early_usage
In short, the phrase ‘Jewish Question’ started to first be used in Europe amongst some educated folks during the ‘Enlightenment Era’ AKA ‘The Age of Reason’ (during which many European Jews were [STUPIDLY] emancipated from their ghettos via Napoleon’s unhinged edicts] and the phrase slowly became more common amongst the European intelligentsia by the 19th Century (long before the Nazis ever existed).
Isn’t it funny how non-Jewish ‘anti-Semites’ like us often know more about many Jewish issues and Jewish history than many modern secular/atheist ethnic Jews like you?
And do you want to know what I think? There is no such thing as a ‘Jewish Question’ — there is no ‘question’ anymore that Jews are extremely harmful to non-Jewish nations…that question has long since been answered in the affirmative.
Instead of a ‘Jewish Question’ what we have is an outright ‘Jewish Problem.’
David Doyle:”Jews can’t stand Whites having an opinion about them and their actions unless they have the power to press the delete button.”
Repeat after me…Jews hate free speech, Jews hate free speech, Jews hate free speech…
>> You’re in the wrong place if you expect people here to be fooled by the 2% number. While Jews are 2% of Americans, they are almost 50% of billionaires and 20% of millionaires. They are the wealthiest ethnic group in America.
I have two points to this, firstly, politicians answer to their constituants, as Democrats recently got a good reminder of in Massachusetts.
Secondly, Jews are very individualistic and have all kinds of diverse viewpoints. I.E. there are Jewish capitalists and communists. There are Jewish Democrats and Jewish Republicans. There are Jewish atheists and Jewish young-earth-creationists. There are even anti-Israel Jews along with the pro-Israel Jews. There are Pro-Palestine Jews and Pro-rightwingIsraeli Jews. To lump all Jews together under one ideological camp is not factual.
>> The JTA article acknowledges that Jews control The Huff Post: they are sufficiently powerful enough to ensure that anti-Semitic comments are deleted at that website and most others like it. This is why White Nationalists are always complaining about Jewish media control.
I would refer you to http://frontpagemag.com/2010/01/14/anti-semitism-and-anti-israel-hatred-on-the-huffington-post-part-1-by-huff-watcher/
By the way, Arianna Huffington is Greek Orthodox.
As for the co-founders, any religion Kenneth Lerer may have does not seem to be on the Internet. Lerer is a Jewish surname but Kenneth Lerer’s wikipedia page just displays Lerer as an American businessman. Kenneth Lerer is an Obama supporter, and of course, Obama perceives himself as being for greater reconciliation with Arabs and Muslims. So much for any kind of Jewish or Zionist lobby at work.
The other co-fdr Jonah Peretti has a Jewish father and an Italian mother, so only Reform Jews would consider Peretti Jewish and everyone else wouldn’t.
>> You are also knocking over a straw man of Jewish Power. While the Israelis haven’t gotten everything they want, the Jew Power in America still exercises substantial control over U.S. Middle East foreign policy.
1) Obama is a dove, not a hawk, in his Middle East policy, the opposite of Bush.
2) I didn’t know that George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Robert Gates, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, and Hillary Clinton are all Jewish. O.o
The irony of course is that after reading that JTA article, the most sane and reasonable inference would be that the organized Jewish community and powerful Jews, along with the indirect help and support of regular Jews, are actively seeking to come up with a response to advance their interests in a new, open medium (i.e. the internet) that has opened up and over which they don’t have as much power. Yet if you merely pointed out this fact you would be denounced as a conspiracy theorist, rabid anti-Semite, etc. Even though it’s explicitly spelled out in the article. By Jews themselves, no less!
Kerrigan,
I disagree. The most popular political sites on the internet like Free Republic and The Huffington Post censor anti-Semitic material in both the articles they are willing to publish and the comments that are allowed to appear.
The censorship isn’t 100% effective. There is some leakage through the cracks. This is another case of Jews claiming to be powerless because they are only getting 95% of what they want.
SJ,
1.) I acknowledge the diversity that exists within the Jewish community, but you are overstating your case here. A broad consensus within American Jewry exists on a number of topics: fighting anti-Semitism, supporting Israel, redefining Americanism as multiculturalism, fighting what Jews call “racism,” and so on.
2.) In a liberal democracy, it is true that politicians must answer their constituents. Unfortunately, the masses have to get their information from somewhere. Politicians have to raise money to run successful campaigns.
This is where the Jew Power kicks into action: through censoring anti-Semitic points of view in the mass media, through defining mainstream respectability as philo-Semitism and anti-racism, through huge campaign contributions and donations to the two major political parties.
3.) Yes, I know that Arianna Huffington isn’t Jewish, but her website is still controlled by Jews in the sense that anti-Semitic opinions are proscribed there. Jews don’t have to control every media outlet to control the media. They just have to be powerful and vocal enough to push their ethnic agenda on a disorganized and apathetic White majority.
In the Antebellum era, slaveowners didn’t control every newspaper in the Old South. Most Southerners didn’t own slaves. In the North, slavery had long been outlawed in most states, but Northern politicians like Stephen Douglas advanced a pro-slavery agenda even there. The Slave Power got its way most of the time.
A minority of a minority can easily control an apathetic majority.
4.) Obama has continued the policies of his predecessors. He hasn’t demanded that Israel tear down its own Berlin Wall. He hasn’t demanded that Palestinians be allowed to return. He continues to shower Israel with American foreign aid even after the tragedy in Haiti.
5.) Jews put Barack Obama in the White House. Even though Jews are 2% of Americans, a majority of his campaign contributors were Jewish.
SJ:”By the way, Arianna Huffington is Greek Orthodox.”
Arianna Huffington might not be a Jew, but around 50% or even as high as 75% of their main/regular writers for the HuffPo are Jewish; just look at their list of writers.
Also, the list of linked ‘COLUMNISTS’ at the bottom of that website are about 70% Jewish.
It’s funny because logging on to HuffPo today I noticed they are running a series on a new book entitled SHADOW ELITE — nary a mention though how the international Ashkenazi/Jewish plutocracy is the main ‘shadow elite’ of the USA and other nations: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amy-hertz/shadow-elite-live-video-e_b_437488.html
Antiwar.com
When Arianna nabbed $25 million from Oak Investment Partners, of Palo Alto, California, she was acquired by a financial network that also has significant investments in the Israeli arms industry – an industry, I might add, directly subsidized and controlled by the Israeli government. For example, Oak Investment has invested in IET/Intelligent Electronics, now morphed into Clickservice Software, an Israeli-based company that makes sophisticated weapons systems and sells them to clients such as “an unnamed Far Eastern country.” Oak Investment partner Fred Harman now sits on the Huffington Post’s board.
>> 1.) I acknowledge the diversity that exists within the Jewish community, but you are overstating your case here. A broad consensus within American Jewry exists on a number of topics: fighting anti-Semitism, supporting Israel, redefining Americanism as multiculturalism, fighting what Jews call “racism,” and so on.
a) Jews from more insular religious communities and Jews who are older may be more jittery about antisemitism but Jews who are more removed from that while acknowledging anti-semitism exists, don’t believe it’s to that extent.
For example, Abraham Foxman of the ADL called Rush Limbaugh an anti-semite and Norman Podhoretz defended Rush and Jews who are politically conservative would agree that Rush is not an anti-semite. I don’t think that Rush is an anti-semite.
b) There is no broad consensus in supporting Israel. There’s Jews who are pro-Israel hawks and there’s Jews who are pro-Palestine.
c) Jews who are politically conservative aren’t big on the multiculturalism thing just as conservatives aren’t big on the multiculturalism thing in general. I’m not big on the multiculturalism thing.
d) No sane person likes racism.
>> 2.) In a liberal democracy, it is true that politicians must answer their constituents. Unfortunately, the masses have to get their information from somewhere. Politicians have to raise money to run successful campaigns.
>> This is where the Jew Power kicks into action: through censoring anti-Semitic points of view in the mass media, through defining mainstream respectability as philo-Semitism and anti-racism, through huge campaign contributions and donations to the two major political parties.
a) No political idea, candidate, or program, can com into fruition without the agreement of gentiles. Jews are a tiny part of the population.
b) Anti-Israel viewpoints permeate colleges and the mainstream media.
>> 3.) Yes, I know that Arianna Huffington isn’t Jewish, but her website is still controlled by Jews in the sense that anti-Semitic opinions are proscribed there. Jews don’t have to control every media outlet to control the media. They just have to be powerful and vocal enough to push their ethnic agenda on a disorganized and apathetic White majority.
Frontpage magazine is not a pro-Israel news source. The Frontpage Magazine article that I linked to before in this thread in fact shows how the Huffington Post is anti-Israel.
>> 4.) Obama has continued the policies of his predecessors. He hasn’t demanded that Israel tear down its own Berlin Wall. He hasn’t demanded that Palestinians be allowed to return. He continues to shower Israel with American foreign aid even after the tragedy in Haiti.
a) Obama is more pro-Palestine than Bush was and Obama is more open to negotiating with Iran than Bush was.
b) The wall is to keep out terrorists, and a supposed right of return is silly. There was a war, Arabs lost, get over it.
>> 5.) Jews put Barack Obama in the White House. Even though Jews are 2% of Americans, a majority of his campaign contributors were Jewish.
Like I said before, for Barack Obama to be in the White House, gentiles had to agree with it.
1.) A broad consensus exists across the American Jewish community from the most Orthodox neocons to Reform liberals that “fighting anti-Semitism” should be a huge priority for the Jewish community.
There is some debate over exactly who can be considered an anti-Semite. Some Jewish extremists and organizations claim that an obsequious philo-Semite and Zionist like Rush Limbaugh is really an anti-Semite. That’s how far they successfully moved the goal posts.
2.) There is a broad consensus that Israel should be supported. Neither J-Street or AIPAC contest the legitimacy of the Jewish state. The internal debate that goes on within the American Jewish community is over small particulars.
3.) The overwhelming majority of Jews support multiculturalism. Jewish neocons on the Right suppress debate over the issue within the political mainstream. Only a handful of outliers like Lawrence Auster or Paul Gottfried contest the matter.
4.) The term “racism” didn’t come into circulation until the 1930s. The overwhelming majority of Americans were “racially prejudiced” until the mid-twentieth century. Before the FDR/Truman years, “racism” wasn’t considered a social problem in America.
5.) In the Antebellum era, slaveowners were a minority of Southerners who were a minority of Americans. The Slave Power was still able to control national policy (ex. Dred Scott and the Kansas-Nebraska Act) though by using the same methods that the Jew Power relies on today.
6.) Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionism are not the same thing. Tim Wise is an anti-Zionist, but not an anti-Semite. This is another example of philo-Semites moving the goal posts to create the illusion of debate. There isn’t a single college in America that endorses the abolition of the Jewish state in Palestine.
7.) David Horowitz is not pro-Israel enough for your tastes? That says a lot.
8.) Obama is not pro-Palestine in any real sense of the word. He hasn’t demanded that Palestinians be allowed to return to their homes in Israel. He hasn’t cut off American foreign aid. He hasn’t forced Israel to stop building its wall. He hasn’t forced Israel to cede full civil rights to its Arab minority either.
9.) The same Jewish organizations that support Israel’s Great Wall oppose the border fence along the U.S.-Mexico border that could keep out illegal aliens and drug traffickers.
10.) Barack Obama would not be President of the United States without the Jewish donors who bankrolled his campaign.
Jews are forever and fulsomely arguing about what’s best for jews. They’re all in complete agreement that Whites arguing about what’s best for Whites is absolutely not good for jews. No argument about that.
>> There is some debate over exactly who can be considered an anti-Semite. Some Jewish extremists and organizations claim that an obsequious philo-Semite and Zionist like Rush Limbaugh is really an anti-Semite. That’s how far they successfully moved the goal posts.
They’re just extremists. No big deal.
>> 2.) There is a broad consensus that Israel should be supported. Neither J-Street or AIPAC contest the legitimacy of the Jewish state. The internal debate that goes on within the American Jewish community is over small particulars.
Still, Jstreet is more inclined to be more Pro-Palestine than AIPAC, hence the divergence.
>> 3.) The overwhelming majority of Jews support multiculturalism. Jewish neocons on the Right suppress debate over the issue within the political mainstream. Only a handful of outliers like Lawrence Auster or Paul Gottfried contest the matter.
Gentiles on the left also support multiculturalism. It’s not a jew nonjew thing, it’s a left/right thing.
>> 6.) Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionism are not the same thing.
Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionism overlaps alot.
>> There isn’t a single college in America that endorses the abolition of the Jewish state in Palestine.
Not officially. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/134601
>> 7.) David Horowitz is not pro-Israel enough for your tastes? That says a lot.
I never said that David Horowitz wasn’t pro-Israel enough. lol He’s pro-Israel just fine, and I don’t put words in your mouth. -_-
>> He hasn’t forced Israel to cede full civil rights to its Arab minority either.
In Israel, Arabs have free speech and the right to vote. How many Arab countries give Arabs free speech and the right to vote?
>> 9.) The same Jewish organizations that support Israel’s Great Wall oppose the border fence along the U.S.-Mexico border that could keep out illegal aliens and drug traffickers.
Really? The absolute same organizations? As it is, I am for Israel’s security fence, and a border fence along the U.S.-Mexico border.
>> 10.) Barack Obama would not be President of the United States without the Jewish donors who bankrolled his campaign.
Did the jews also force the nonjews to vote for Obama? O.o
1.) It is a big deal. They are able to control mainstream political discourse.
2.) As I noted above, J Street and AIPAC don’t contest Israel’s legitimacy. Hence, a consensus on the topic exists within American Jewish community.
3.) Of course. I have never said that all multiculturalists are Jews. I will argue that Jewish agitators pushed multiculturalism into the American mainstream. They are the ones who “led the charge.”
4.) Anti-Zionism does not necessarily entail prejudice against Jews.
5.) You said “Frontpage magazine is not a pro-Israel news source.” How is Frontpage Magazine not pro-Israel?
6.) Yes. The ADL comes to mind.
7.) That’s not how the Jew Power operates. No, the Jews did not force Gentiles to vote for Obama, but they used their wealth and influence to push his candidacy and frame the public debate in such a way that a philo-Semitic outcome was assured.
>> 1) It is a big deal. They are able to control mainstream political discourse.
What exactly would you like to debate that you feel that Jews are censoring? O.o
>> 2.) As I noted above, J Street and AIPAC don’t contest Israel’s legitimacy. Hence, a consensus on the topic exists within American Jewish community.
It’s not as simple as that. There is a difference, as I’ve said already on this blog. Also, going back to my original point on how diverse Jewish opinion is, there are extremists on the Jewish left and in the Jewish religion that are even against Israel’s existence.
>> 3.) Of course. I have never said that all multiculturalists are Jews. I will argue that Jewish agitators pushed multiculturalism into the American mainstream. They are the ones who “led the charge.”
Really? Jews are the only ones who agitated for multiculturalism?
>> 4.) Anti-Zionism does not necessarily entail prejudice against Jews.
Ahmadinejad is not anti-Semitic, he’s just anti-Zionist, and he wants to nuke a country full of jews.
>> 5.) You said “Frontpage magazine is not a pro-Israel news source.” How is Frontpage Magazine not pro-Israel?
My mistake. I meant to say that the Huffington Israel is not a pro-Israel news source. Frontpage Magazine is a pro-Israel news source. I should have proofread better.
>> 7.) That’s not how the Jew Power operates. No, the Jews did not force Gentiles to vote for Obama, but they used their wealth and influence to push his candidacy and frame the public debate in such a way that a philo-Semitic outcome was assured.
What is the outcome that you would like to happen?
What exactly would you like to debate that you feel that Jews are censoring?
We don’t want to debate anything. There is nothing to debate. We’re dealing with conflicting self-interests.
We want to be able to present the truth and communicate among ourselves without alien gatekeepers disrupting that communication.
Really? Jews are the only ones who agitated for multiculturalism?
It is their project. That they turned quite a few gentiles into “extended phenotypes” (“useful idiots”) along the way in no way changes this. The notion that multiculturalism is not an essentially Jewish project is ludicrous. It doesn’t serve the interests of Whites, so White participation in the prioject is necessarily the result of manipulation by the authors of the project. It’s basic biology.
SJ, 1) What do you think of Jewish-engineered forced race-replacement of the U.S.’s Euros which started in 1965 with the “It’s Good For The Jews” Hart-Celler-Kennedy immigration bill, 2) would you like forced Jew-replacement of Jews in Israel, 3) what’s your best guess as to whether or not Abe Foxman would like forced Jew-replacement of Jews in Israel and if he wouldn’t, why can’t he see it’s the same as the forced white replacement of whites in the U.S. that he supports, and 4) how many Jews would you guess agree with immediate implementation of a one-hundred-percent effective, one-hundred percent humane, financially-compensated where applicable, repatriation program for sending all Eurosphere racial/ethnocultural incompatibles either back to their countries of origin or on a one-way ticket to Israel? I figure since the Jews love non-whites so much they must love the Israel idea.
The Jewish mind lumps all non-Jews together as gentiles. The white protestant vote went to McCain despite his having been utterly corrupted and anti-white-ified by Jewish money. Obama was a one-hundred percent Jewish creation, first discovered as a potential pol by Abner Mikva’s daughter who had him as a student in one of her college classes, who notified her father of her find, and The Magic Negro was then passed on to the network of Jewish marxoid “potential pol” farm-team scouts who immediately began managing and grooming him for a rise up the political ladder, with the final result you see before you today.
Subtract the non-whites from “gentiles” please (I know that’s mentally hard for a Jew to do, but give it your best shot). Then let’s see how many of the remainder support multiculturalism. How many major Jewish organizations in the U.S. support ramming multiculti down U.S. throats and oppose it for Israel — a hundred percent? A thousand percent? A trillion percent? What’s your best guess?
>> We don’t want to debate anything. There is nothing to debate. We’re dealing with conflicting self-interests.
What conflicting self interests?
>> We want to be able to present the truth and communicate among ourselves without alien gatekeepers disrupting that communication.
What “truth” are the “gatekeepers” trying to censor? O.o
>> It is their project. That they turned quite a few gentiles into “extended phenotypes” (“useful idiots”) along the way in no way changes this. The notion that multiculturalism is not an essentially Jewish project is ludicrous. It doesn’t serve the interests of Whites, so White participation in the prioject is necessarily the result of manipulation by the authors of the project. It’s basic biology.
So, if a person agrees with another person on something, he is automatically that person’s “useful idiot?” O.o If both jews and nonjews are trying to sell multiculturalism, it’s still primarily a Jewish thing? o.O
>> 1) What do you think of Jewish-engineered forced race-replacement of the U.S.’s Euros which started in 1965 with the “It’s Good For The Jews” Hart-Celler-Kennedy immigration bill
Hart is Catholic, Celler is mixed German Catholic and Jewish heritage, and that Kennedy is Catholic. This brings me to my point from before that even if you can show that an idea originated from a jew, it still needs nonjews agreeing with it.
>> 3) what’s your best guess as to whether or not Abe Foxman would like forced Jew-replacement of Jews in Israel and if he wouldn’t, why can’t he see it’s the same as the forced white replacement of whites in the U.S. that he supports, and
Trying to say that the United States is forcibly replacing white people with nonwhite people sounds a little conspiratorial, don’t you think?
>> 4) how many Jews would you guess agree with immediate implementation of a one-hundred-percent effective, one-hundred percent humane, financially-compensated where applicable, repatriation program for sending all Eurosphere racial/ethnocultural incompatibles either back to their countries of origin or on a one-way ticket to Israel? I figure since the Jews love non-whites so much they must love the Israel idea.
I’m not sure what this is trying to get at.
>> The Jewish mind lumps all non-Jews together as gentiles. The white protestant vote went to McCain despite his having been utterly corrupted and anti-white-ified by Jewish money. Obama was a one-hundred percent Jewish creation, first discovered as a potential pol by Abner Mikva’s daughter who had him as a student in one of her college classes, who notified her father of her find, and The Magic Negro was then passed on to the network of Jewish marxoid “potential pol” farm-team scouts who immediately began managing and grooming him for a rise up the political ladder, with the final result you see before you today.
Obama is a leftist creation i.e. Bill Ayers (not Jewish), Jeremiah Wright (not Jewish), ACORN (not Jewish). Also, calling McCain anti-white sounds conspiratorial.
>> Subtract the non-whites from “gentiles” please (I know that’s mentally hard for a Jew to do, but give it your best shot). Then let’s see how many of the remainder support multiculturalism. How many major Jewish organizations in the U.S. support ramming multiculti down U.S. throats and oppose it for Israel — a hundred percent? A thousand percent? A trillion percent? What’s your best guess?
To say that there are no white multiculturalists is silly. Also, in Israel, a multitude of different cultures live in peace.
When SJ is without an answer he says “that’s silly.”
I assume this is White Jewish and Proud or Jewish Race Realist under a new name.
>> When SJ is without an answer he says “that’s silly.”
* cough * that’s silly isn’t the only thing I said.
>> I assume this is White Jewish and Proud or Jewish Race Realist under a new name.
If you are referring to me, I haven’t posted on this blog before this thread by any name.
Talking to the Jews about the bad stuff Jews do, stuff like genociding everyone in sight for example, is a fool’s errand because they’ll never admit it. It’s like the earthquake going off in Port au Prince and a Jew standing right there says, “Earthquake? What earthquake? I didn’t feel any earthquake.” It’s exactly like that. Or like an H-bomb going off and a Jew standing right at ground zero says, “Bomb? What bomb? I didn’t hear any bomb.” That’s what it’s like talking to a Jew about the bad Jews do. Forget it, they ain’t gonna admit it.
That’s OK, SJ, don’t let me interrupt — you were saying? (I’ll just humor him here …..)
OK Fred, there there, Jews are in full control of the United States and there’s nothing you can do about it. By next week you are going to be investigated by every single federal agency. XD
(Disclaimer: this post is a JOKE)
On a serious note, Israel does have a field hospital in Haiti.
Oh right you also said “that’s conspiratorial,” yeah you do have a rather large, impressive repertoire of devastating “comebacks.”
1.) Any number of topics.
2.) The difference within the mainstream is over details. It is true that there are a few outlier Jews that contest Israel’s existence. A broad consensus doesn’t mean unanimous agreement.
3.) I didn’t say they were the only ones. Jews have always made intelligent use of Gentile allies. I said they “led the charge.” If it weren’t for Jewish influence, America would not have embraced multiculturalism.
4.) The difference is that Israel really has nukes pointed at Iran.
5.) The Huff Post censors anti-Semitic comments. It doesn’t call for the abolition of the Jewish state.
6.) A White Nationalist outcome.
“The Jewish Question” was widely discussed and referred to as such in the 19th century.
http://tinyurl.com/yhqpbrm
Well, noone will take racist comments, but still, what kind of anti-Semitic comments do you feel that the Huffington Post censors? XD
And comeon, you know Israel’s nukes are purely defensive.
Who were the Jews who influenced multiculturalism? O.o
Do you really think I could openly post my opinions at the Huff Post?
We can start with Horace Kallen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horace_Kallen
Who were the Jews who influenced multiculturalism?
Try Hermann Cohen, Horace Kallen, Lionel Trilling, Herbert Solow, Henry Rosenthal, Tess Slesinger, Felix Morrow, Clifton Fadiman, Anita Brenner, and Elliot Cohen.
I love interlocutors like SJ, their dishonesty is so illuminating! Ironic, no?
Look for him to “reboot” soon after losing the argument here; he’ll be back, and he’ll pretend this conversation never happened and precipitate further waste of time on kicking his ass again. This may involve a name change too. Then he’ll reboot again, and again, and again…
Well, noone will take racist comments
Lie. Plenty of “anti-racist” sites will let you blame anything you like on whites and criticize them in openly defamatory language.
I mean, check out his babe in the woods routine! Like he hasn’t had this conversation many times already, and this is all so new to him. LOL. What, he’s the only Jew in the universe too dumb to use Google?
I’ve seen his handle somewhere before, btw. Maybe at Half-Sigma?
So, if a person agrees with another person on something, he is automatically that person’s “useful idiot?” O.o If both jews and nonjews are trying to sell multiculturalism, it’s still primarily a Jewish thing? o.O
If a white agrees with a Jew on something having to do with white or Jewish interests, then yes, it’s very likely the white is a useful idiot. The more directly the something impacts white or Jewish interests, the truer this becomes.
This brings me to my point from before that even if you can show that an idea originated from a jew, it still needs nonjews agreeing with it.
When a con man defrauds a little old lady, even if you can show that the fraud originated from the con man, the little old lady’s agreement is still required.
So what?
Trying to say that the United States is forcibly replacing white people with nonwhite people sounds a little conspiratorial, don’t you think?
We want for whites what Jews have for themselves in Israel. Do you support that? What percentage of American Jews do you suppose would line up against that?
Also, calling McCain anti-white sounds conspiratorial.
Calling McCain an Uncle Tom sounds conspiratorial to you?
Horace Kallen was a student of William James, who was a catholic pluralist.
Hermann Cohen was influenced by Immanuel Kant who seems to have been a pluralist if you do a google search.
Lionel Trilling was a marxist. It would seem to me that “Jewish interests” was not a big deal to him.
Felix Morrow was a communist. Same comment as Trilling.
Gentile multiculturalists include Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, George Santayana, Horace Kallen, John Dewey, WEB Du Bois, Alain Leroy Locke.
Actually Svigor, as I myself am against multiculturalism since I’m politically conservative, the multiculturalists aren’t exactly people I spent my time concerning myself with.
I believe that these points stand that
- There are nonjewish multiculturalists.
- Nothing can happen without the agreement of gentiles. i.e. Karl Marx started communism, but he did not magically snap his fingers and make Russia communist, it took the agreement of the nonjewish communists to make it happen.
William James was influenced by Felix Adler. Randolph Bourne and John Dewey were influenced by Horace Kallen. The fount of multiculturalism in the United States can be traced back to late ninteenth century/early twentieth century Jews. “Cultural Pluralism” was later popularized in the 1930s by the New York Intellectuals.
Defamation is a very interesting documentary exploring what anti-Semitism means today. It exposes Jewish behavior and their culture of death worship to manipulate their youth and for profit. Finkelstein is hilarious.
http://wideeyecinema.com/?p=7208
DavidDuke.com:
from the Israel News, Ynet Published: 01.28.10, 20:59 / Israel News
Israel plundered and destroyed tens of thousands of Palestinian books in the years after the State’s establishment, according to a doctoral thesis to be submitted next month by a Ben-Gurion University researcher.
In an interview with the researcher published on al-Jazeera’s website Thursday, he claimed that Israel destroyed the Palestinian books in the framework of its plan to “Judaize the country” and cut off its Arab residents from their nation and culture.
Multiculturalism is not a jew / nonjew issue. It’s a left/right issue. There are Jews on the right who are against multiculturalism.
Jews injected their ideal of multiculturalism into American political discourse. In the 1930s, Jews popularized “cultural pluralism” which replaced Anglo-conformity as the reigning paradigm of Americanism. Were it not for Jewish influence, “multiculturalism” would not have triumphed in the United States.
A small handful of Jews criticize multiculturalism (Paul Gottfried and Lawrence Auster), but they are shunned by their co-ethnics and have no influence on the wider Jewish community.
Like Norman Finkelstein is shunned and was even imprisoned in Israel and deported.
Jews on the right are less inclined to be multiculturalists.
Jews on the American Right tend to suppress debate about the issue.
>> Jews on the American Right tend to suppress debate about the issue.
How so? O.o This is news to me. XD
It’s all very wearying.
SJ comes here and thinks that popping off with his prepackaged talking points that are so very effective at shut-uppery of the Jew-Clueless,
will gain for himself the same gratifying result here.
Hunter, why argue with him? We won’t convince HIM. Is it done for the benefit of the persuadables lurking, so THEY can see the Jewish arguments and tactics and the excellent WN arguments against them?
Some Jew
What conflicting self interests?
Whites are better off in white nations. Jews are better off in multiracial nations.
If whites are not under the control of jewish plutocrats they will inevitably restrict the right of or expel jews.
This has happened dozens of times.
Jews bear a grudge over this and based on their actions they intend to completely wipe out the white race through mass immigration and miscegenation. Europe will be mongrelized like South America. Parts of the United States, with its huge non-white population, will end up like South Africa today.
Jews were behind the end of white rule in South Africa, by the way.
B, are you also apart of the 2012, nibiru, reptilian, and ufo crowds? XD
“B, are you also apart of the 2012, nibiru, reptilian, and ufo crowds? XD”
No. I’m a goldbug, which is how I got my education that conspiracies (to gain and keep power) do in fact occur.
Weak attempt at distraction.
Did you copy and paste from your database developed for such occasions as when you encounter someone who’s aware of Jewish “debate” tactics?
There are no Jewish debate tactics aside from “deny everything the goys accuse Jews of, it makes no difference what reasons you give, just deny all of it, use the Clintonian ‘that depends on what the meaning of is is’ if you have to, just deny it.” Arguing with this ilk is a fool’s errand. Their objective is to tie you up and keep you turning around and around in circles like a dog chasing a flea in his tail. Don’t waste your time except to ridicule them with sarcasm, etc. They never debate in good faith. They’ll deny two plus two with a straight face and leave you feeling like a fricking moron for having wasted your time with them.
The Jews were/are the main factor imposing multiculturalism and PC on this society. Period. The Jews were the main factor engineering the 1965 open-borders immigration bill. Period. The Jews are the main factor keeping anyone from closing the borders again. Period. The Jews are the ones who created Obama from scratch and maneuvered him into the Senate then the presidency. Period. The Jews are why we have the policy we have with respect to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Period. Nothing to argue about, any more than water is wet, the wind blows, or two plus two.
“The Sixties” are properly viewed as a Jewish revolt. Period.
Jews are the ones who want to censor and criminalize speech. Period.
Hey, SJ, assuming you’ve not fled yet:
I keep calculating my net worth. I keep goggling at the answer I get. I keep pinching myself.
I began buying gold at $375 and kept it up all the way to $900. Up 80% on my average cost basis since 2004. Whilst all the rest of the fools and philosemites (but I repeat myself) who believed what Jews on Wall Street told them, are flat or down since 2004 in their 401Ks. (Most likely down as they probably sold in despair when DOW hit $6500 in March ’09.)
Up 80% on my average cost basis since 2004 for betting that Jewish conspiracies not only exist, despite Jewish denials, but that they are going to collapse spectacularly. (Which they did, and will continue to do.)
See ya at $gold $2000. I’ll be richer and you’ll still be repeating your same sophistry.
“There are no Jewish debate tactics aside from “deny everything the goys accuse Jews of”
Agreed. And if all else fails, they’ll accuse you of being a UFO nut or something equally ridiculous.
It’s odd that 2% of the population accomplishes nearly 100% of the theft.
Even a brigade of black barbarians stealing a couple “Benjamins” from the liquor store cannot begin to steal a fraction of what one Jew can steal.
I would like to see a quota system: an Affirmative Action for the Federal Reserve etc.
Better a doltish black or a spic than another Jew.
And it may split the Jew dominated left!
By the way, Communism was the Second Christianity, created by the same race for the same purpose.
Look in Acts, there you will see “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”
Dang B caught me, I’m going to have to discuss B at the next convention of International Jews. lol We need to update our databases. XD
On a serious note, Fred, I’m not saying there aren’t jewish multiculturalists. There are. There are also gentile multiculturalists, and jewish nonmulticulturalists, thereby making it exactly what it is- a left/right issue, not a jew/nonjew issue. There are jews of all the ideological camps you can think of.
And Fred, I’m pretty sure I answered the bulk of your suggestions already on this very thread.
OK I’m going to argue like a Jew now:
__________________
Example 1:
some Euro says: “Birds fly.”
Fred (arguing like a Jew) replies: “It’s wrong to say birds fly: ostriches, emus, and penguins can’t get airborne so ‘birds fly’ is false. To say mammals give birth is false because platypus ducks are mammals yet don’t give birth. To say dogs bark is false: the dingo dog is barkless. To say Jews don’t want to convert to Islam is false: there is a group of Jewish converts to Islam. So, the following statements are false: birds fly, mammals give birth, dogs bark, and Jews don’t want to convert to Islam.”
____________________
Example 2:
some Euro says: “Children are small.”
Fred (arguing like a Jew) replies: “I’m not saying there aren’t small children. There are. There are also small midgets and non-small children, thereby making smallness exactly what it is – a little-big issue, not a child-nonchild issue. There are children of all bignesses.”
As always, massive props to Fred in demonstrating Jewish double talk into such easily understood (and rather funny) examples!
Simply Excellent.
Being a Jew, doubletalk comes naturally to him.
Thus Mark, I am so glad that Fred is on our side.
He is irreplaceable Comrade–and Brother–in Our Cause.
Anyone remember John Edwards in the vice presidental debate at the time? Edwards tried some slick trial-lawyer lines and Cheney crushed him.
In any case Fred, funny satire, but there really are jews on the political right in the USA.
Apart from a couple of paleocons (Gottfried, Auster), the representation of Jews on the right is within Neoconservatism, a Trotsky-inspired ideology that promotes mass immigration and multiculturalism.
The political right in the US is just a lite version of the left.
Ultimately, Jewish influence and power transcends this dichotomy of Left and Right.
Jewish influence and power is channeled politically through these sides, and historically it’s been predominantly through the Left, and it still mostly is. It has become slightly more Right over the past few decades, and it’s possible that it will become more Right as Jews consolidate their gains. That is, it is possible that they will become more “conservative” in order to conserve their positions of wealth and power.
But just because Jews move Right-ward doesn’t mean that Jewish influence and power disappears or that Jewish interests cease to be served. They would remain and continue to be served. It would be an adaptation to the circumstances.
You can count American Renaissance’s comments section as a place where Jews dare not be named. Who is in charge over there, Abe Foxman?
SJ keeps repeating the lamest , most tired dissimulations that we’ve all heard a thousands times and that have been thoroughly debunked by MacDonald and others.
“We need to update our databases”
You certainly do. The excessive repetition of your ilk’s same, tired, old arguments has made you laughingstocks.
Neoconservatism is not Trotskyest. That’s ridiculous.
Larue, there are Jews of all different ideological camps just like there is everyone of all different ideological camps.
B, seems to be I responded to some of the same arguments more than once on this thread. O.o
Neoconservatism was inspired by followers of Trotsky. Modern neoconservatism is clearly a significant deviation from Trotskyism but nonetheless the intellectual heritage is there.
The history of neoconservatism being a significantly (but not exclusively) Jewish endeavor coupled with its roots in communism is something that is rarely talked about.
Trotskyism = Podhoretzim fomenting worldwide revolution to effect worldwide Jewish hegemony.
Neoconservatism = Podhoretzim fomenting worldwide revolution to effect worldwide Jewish hegemony.
A population that has coevolved with a variety of religious forms may disperse into a population that has not so coevolved and reduce the fitness of the indigenous population if religions promoting universal altruism are the only religions promoted among the indigenous population (religions promoting reciprocal, or even kin, altruism remaining within the dispersing population). This appears to have happened when the technical infrastructure of the Roman Empire compensated for the naturally harsh conditions at the frontiers of that Empire creating an environment within which the universal altruism of Christianity was promoted among Europeans by Paul and the other early Christian Proselytes who were Jews. Jewish religious belief, however, retained its tribal character, expressing both reciprocal and kin altruism. The result was an extended period of Jewish success in diaspora among Europeans in competition with holders of indigenous niches involving religious beliefs and inter-tribal trade. This successful displacement of indigenous religions and trade niches has continued till this day (including recent innovations in religion such as Marxism, Rosenbaumian (Ayn Rand) philosophy aka “Objectivism”, Boasian anthropology/sociology, Freudian psychology, etc.). Jews have typically led political movements to liberalize immigration laws for a variety of reasons. Interestingly, however, anti-immigrationism among Jews has recently arisen. This appears due to a profound change in Western Civilization resulting from their very success and domination and is largely the result of advancing technologies of the empires of the modern era as they result in integration of immigrants to the West from ecologies closer to human origins than those in which Jews evolved. Just as religions and peoples (i.e. Jews) coevolved in locations closer to human origins than Europe displaced indigenous European religions and trade niches, so now cultures from even closer to human origin than the Levant will potentially displace those from the Levant in its niches in the West.
Trotskyism = Podhohoretzim fomenting worldwide revolution to effect worldwide Jewish hegemony.
Neoconservatism = Podhohoretzim fomenting worldwide revolution to effect worldwide Jewish hegemony.
Actually neoconservatism is more about the USA retaining its place as the world superpower hence Project For a New American Century.
It isn’t “Project for a New Jewish Century,” it’s Project For a New American Century.
Actually neoconservatism is more about the USA retaining its place as the world superpower hence Project For a New American Century.
It isn’t “Project for a New Jewish Century,” it’s Project For a New American Century.
At this point I can’t tell if “SJ” is parodying the “anti anti-Semites.”
Right, that goal will be assured by the Jewish neocon open-borders plan of replacing U.S. whites with Mexicans, Somali Bantus, and Arab Moslems. Once it consists of that racial mix, the U.S. will be able to police the world like never before!
You mean they were being modest for once?
Liberal jews and jewish neocons are two separate ideological camps.
Neocons themselves (OK the older generation of them) have bragged that their ideology comes from Trotskyism so it is foolish for SJ to engage in such dissimulation. It is as if he thinks we started as anti-Semites then chose facts to suit our starting position. Virtually every WNist and paleocon does not start off hostile to Jews but becomes hostile due to recognition over many years of certain behavioural patterns.
SJ: Larue, there are Jews of all different ideological camps just like there is everyone of all different ideological camps.
Only a moron would buy into that. Jews are only prominent in Jewish-dominated ideological camps that preach universalism for whites but allow Jews to be ethnocentric. Given that Jews define any movement that is not run by them as “anti-Semitic” there are very few Jews involved with genuine nationalist movements anywhere in the West.
Even in Belgium where the Vlaams Belang has bent over backwards to the country’s Jewish population the Jews remain hostile to Flemish nationalists. Walk around the Jewish area of Antwerp and you will see the anti-Vlaams Belang propaganda posters everywhere. (Where did Friedrich Braun get the idea that Vlaams Belang was making headway with Belgian Jews?). Even though all anti-Semitism in Belgium comes from Muslims the Jews still target the only party in the country that wants to limit the number of Muslims entering Belgium. It is the same in Britain with the BNP.
If American Jews like SJ were friends of whites they would be spending more time at Jewish sites like Pajamas Media trying to convince them to support immigration control than here or HBD blogs attacking the anti-Semitism that is merely a reaction to their group behaviour.
Not as regards immigration. They are equally in favor of open borders with the Third World.
Outstanding comment by Matra a couple above, every word of it.
SJ, do you understand it’s the Jews’ unswerving insistence on having open borders with the Third World — their insistence, in other words, on having excessive non-white immigration coming into Euro countries with the inevitable social problems and race-change that entails — that has all of us mad at the Jews? The Jews don’t just insist on non-whites flooding in, they insist on laws, rules, regulations, and directives that virually guarantee by law that the non-whites will replace the whites in whites’ own country.
Mad isn’t the word for it: we feel about the Jews as the Jews feel about the Nazis. We see the Jews genociding us.
The Jews reject the immigration issue as a valid reason to be mad at them because to them, our concern about the race of our countries is anti-Semitic, hateful, and illegitimate, something to be totally dismissed rather than taken into account as anything remotely valid. Therefore they close their ears when we complain about it and keep right on pushing for it.
No, it wasn’t the priest telling us when we were seven that “the Jews killed Christ” — that’s not why we’re mad at the Jews, although that’s what the Jews tell themselves so they won’t have to face facts.
That’s not it. It’s that the Jews are powerfully engaged along with certain allies of theirs in genociding our race.
Can you grasp that?
The ill feeling this engenders in us toward the Jews can’t in the long run be a good thing, but the Jews wielding influence keep right on wielding it in directions we keep on hating, so they must have calculated that the payoff for them outweighs whatever bad may come of our growing antipathy toward them as a group.
We’ll see how this all shakes out. But to those who’ve brought it about and turned a deaf ear to all complaints, don’t complain when others are finally in a position to do something about it and turn you a deaf ear.
13 senators
31 congressmen
That’s a tad more than 2%!
13 senators is a substantial core particularly when there are 11 dems and 2 ind.
Oh yes, and only 1 republican congressman of the 31.
Factor in some campaign finance sources for shits and giggles.
There’s plenty of white nonjewish business managers who hire illegal immigrants.
So much for turning immigration into a jew-nonjew issue.
>> Mad isn’t the word for it: we feel about the Jews as the Jews feel about the Nazis. We see the Jews genociding us.
The nazis killed jews. Jews aren’t killing anyone. There is no comparison.
Jews only care about jews. Nobody else’s concerns compare.
Right Tanstaafl. I suppose Israel’s field hospital in Haiti is purely imaginary.
There are many ways to achieve genocide. Race-replacement immigration, the particular genocidal strategy the Jews are employing, is a relatively bloodless way but it gets the job done.
The name of the game is still genocide.
Incidentally, it’s not true that Jews aren’t killing anyone: the racial strife they bring about and inflame by forcing disparate races together in the ways certain disparate races are currently being forced together causes a manifold rise in violent crime rates including rape and murder. The Jews are killing whites through Negro and Mexican proxies.
So yes, the Jews are indeed killing people. By proxy. And the fact that Jews refuse to report it in the media they control when whites get raped/killed in this way proves they’re aware of it, since their stifling of news of it when it happens can only be a conscious choice (the proof being they hype any violent crime that goes in the opposite racial direction, hype it to the skies).
The Bolshevik Jews in Soviet Russia surely didn’t kill any Kulaks by ‘proxy’–nor is the genocide of Palestinian Muslims and Christians done through any ‘third party’ channels.
“It was a picture-perfect moment for Israeli public diplomacy.”
http://www.forward.com/articles/123926/
I dont support the broad brush stroke, but cmon – China sent a million bucks, should I feel all warm and fuzzy inside? The Chinese are obviously not out for themselves.
Right Tanstaafl. I suppose Israel’s field hospital in Haiti is purely imaginary.
Great find, flippity. It turns out the American Jewish community’s leading publication — in the headline no less — concedes the hospital is in Haiti to serve public relations purposes:
“Israel’s Relief Effort in Haiti Saves Lives, Boosts Image”.
And look at this:
“…on the ground was a retinue of Israelis dedicated to making sure people heard about their country’s humanitarian mission and spreading the word. Press officers from the Israeli military were flown in, as were photographers and a video team to document the work of Israeli medical and rescue personnel. They distributed daily footage to the press. Representatives of Israeli and foreign media were embedded with the group, and other reporters were invited.”
Those efforts would be better served if the hospital was in Ramallah or Gaza, where the Jewish State is the actual responsible party for murder, destruction of property and, especially, for Crimes against Humanity.
Palestinian official: Israel razed 150 Arab homes in West Bank – Haaretz – Israel News
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1141553.html
>> The name of the game is still genocide.
Having different kinds of people here is not a zero-sum game against whites. The USA is a big place.
Though granted, everyone should Americanize and speak English.
>> Great find, flippity. It turns out the American Jewish community’s leading publication — in the headline no less — concedes the hospital is in Haiti to serve public relations purposes:
I see Ben, so if the jews do something good for other people, the jews are still evil and using it for diabolical global power hungry ends?
Having different kinds of people here is not a zero-sum game against whites. The USA is a big place.
Sure it is.
1.) It means Whites are thrown into economic competition with non-Whites.
2.) It means White political power is deluded.
3.) It means transfer payments from Whites to non-Whites.
4.) It means a neverending series of cultural concessions to placate hostile non-White minority groups.
5.) It means the introduction of non-White violent crime into White areas.
Among other things. Wherever NAMs settle en masse, they drive out the Whites by creating living conditions that Whites find intolerable. Behind this phenomenon, the Jew lurks as the instigator and ringleader.
The reality is, this multi-cultural, multi-racial sham can only exist so long as whites remain willing to submit themselves to non-white rule. A racially conscious White Republic could not live alongside a third-world affirmative action, pro-non-white welfare state. Separation is the best design.
1) It would seem to me whites would compete against nonwhites anyways in the global scheme of things.
2) I wouldn’t want to be pressured into thinking a certain way because of my race.
3) As long as the United States has a minimum wage, the third world will keep getting American jobs.
4) Hatred is wrong from everyone, not just whites.
5) ok ok whites never commit crime. (O.O)
6) ok ok there are absolutely no white neighborhoods that are substandard to a working/middle class lifestyle. (O.O)
Neoconservatism is not Trotskyest. That’s ridiculous.
Argue over the label, tacitly agree with the fact that neocohens are multi-culturalists, open-borders advocates, social liberals (cuz that’s the plan for the goyim in the kosher version of Dar-al-harb), foreign policy hawks (cuz that’s the plan for the Jews in the kosher version of Dar-al-Islam), etc.
I can go with that, sure.
Larue, there are Jews of all different ideological camps just like there is everyone of all different ideological camps.
What are you, a moron? A text-bot? The five Jews who are paleocons and the 2 Jews who are pretending to be Euro ethnopatriots matter how?
WHAT IS THE POINT YOU’RE TRYING TO MAKE? Other than, you’re a moron I mean.
B, seems to be I responded to some of the same arguments more than once on this thread. O.o
Yes, you little sheister, and you’ve refused to revise them after they’ve been successfully countered. Repeating them is just repeated stupidity.
It isn’t “Project for a New Jewish Century,” it’s Project For a New American Century.
As I thought. Moron. Or maybe an ethnopatriot pretending to be a Jew. Tough call, either would behave roughly like SJ.
Liberal jews and jewish neocons are two separate ideological camps.
Both “camps” agree that “is it good for the Jews?” is job one.
They’re separate camps the way an army that separates into two forces to encircle the enemy the following day are “two separate” camps.
Jews of all stripes agree that “is it good for the Jews?” (SJ VERY MUCH AMONG THEM, as is obvious for all to see) is job one.
The way Dems and Repubs agree open borders are a good idea, destroying the white demographic via multiculturalism is a good idea, etc.
You White Nationalist guys are never gonna win. Jews are much more paranoid than you.
“According to a widely accepted view, Britain has provided generous sanctuary to waves of Jewish refugees
fleeing European anti-Semitism. It has provided a tolerant environment in which they have progressed
steadily from exclusion to full integration into British society. This article, will demonstrate that there are
good grounds for regarding this view as largely inaccurate. Recent events have seen the emergence of an
uncomfortable environment for Anglo-Jewry.”
from http://www.yale.edu/yiisa/workingpaper/
There is an endless stream of anti-semitism literature out there.
If its even half-accurate, the only people that arent anti-semitic are Jewish.
Its amazing how dense this SJ character is.
I see Ben, so if the jews do something good for other people, the jews are still evil and using it for diabolical global power hungry ends?
They’ve plainly stated they’re serving cynical political ends. Why shouldn’t I believe them?
Having different kinds of people here is not a zero-sum game against whites. The USA is a big place.
One thing Hunter left out: We’re forbidden to establish and enforce rules against interracial breeding. Without such rules, it is simply a matter of time.
The amount of non-white immigration, the amount of White resources forcibly transferred to non-Whites to make them more attractive to Whites, and the amount of media encouragement of interbreeding simply determine how quickly or slowly the process occurs. But it is inevitable if we cannot establish and enforce rules against interracial breeding.
1.) Global free trade is not inevitable. Anyone familar with America’s long history of protectionist tariffs knows this.
2.) Whites are taught to think of themselves as guilt ridden expressive individualists. In contrast, Jews think of themselves as Jews; blacks think of themselves as blacks; Hispanics and Asians as ethnics and increasingly as a racial group. It is little wonder then that Whites are in decline in every major national institution.
3.) If we were serious about controlling our borders, it wouldn’t be a problem. There were mass deportations under Hoover and Eisenhower.
4.) Very clever. For Whites, ethnic self interest in “hate.” For Jews, ethnic self interest is perfectly legitimate.
5.) You are confusing two different issues. Whites will always suffer from White crime as long as Whites exists. We don’t have to suffer from non-White violent crime. That is an option of which living arrangement we choose.
6.) Why are those neighborhoods substandard? In large part because immigration and free trade drive down wages for the White working class. Once again, Whites have a choice.
Non-Whites are afforded special privileges, by law, including race-based preferences for government contracts, loans, employment, and education. The regime is anti-White. Worse, it is not even forthright about this, posing instead as “non-discriminatory”.
1) Global free trade is inevitable as communication and transportation technologies improve throughout history.
2) Noone should feel guilty for who they are especially for actions committed by a different generation. The jews came up with this concept- Deuteronomy 24:16 “Fathers shall not be put to death for their sons, nor shall sons be put to death for their fathers; everyone shall be put to death for his own sin.” Ezekiel 18:20 “The person who sins is the one who will die. The child will not be punished for the parent’s sins, and the parent will not be punished for the child’s sins. Righteous people will be rewarded for their own righteous behavior, and wicked people will be punished for their own wickedness.”
That being said, groupthink is also wrong, for everyone, and people should be left to come up with their own individual conclusions.
3) I wonder how many white owned restaurants have illegal immigrants working in the back room.
4) You kinda are calling yourself Anti-Semitica. ;D
5) There are good and bad people all over.
6) Ok ok there are no white neighborhoods without immigrants that are substandard to a working/middle class lifestyle. (O.O)
>> The way Dems and Repubs agree open borders are a good idea, destroying the white demographic via multiculturalism is a good idea, etc.
I guess we forgot how George W. Bush resisted the United Nations, the Kyoto treaty, and the International Criminal Court. Just another reason why certain ideas from this site sound more conspiratorial than anything.
SJ,
1.) The steamboat, railroad, and telegraph were more revolutionary that the airplane or the automobile. After the Civil War, an epoch of protectionism replaced the earlier era of low revenue tariffs. If free trade is “inevitable” as you say, how do you explain this?
2.) Apparently, the Jews don’t seem to follow their own advice about groupthink. Every year the local Jewish Federations in North America spend billions of dollars on the maintenance of Jewish ethnic identity.
3.) The only reason we have millions of illegal immigrants in this country is because the current regime refuses to police our Southwestern border. A change of government is the solution to that particular problem.
4.) I admit to harboring a dislike of Jews. I have a negative opinion of Jews as a group based on the facts that I document here. Unlike Jews, I am willing to admit that I am prejudiced.
5.) Whites don’t have to suffer from non-White violent crime. That is a cost of living in an integrated multiracial society. It is optional. In a White ethnostate, 35,000+ White women per year wouldn’t be raped by negroes.
6.) The easiest way to raise the living standards of the White lower classes is to increase the price of labor. Cutting off immigration, changing our trade policies, and deporting non-Whites would produce the desired result.
1) An earlier time?
2) I never saw any point in any of these organizations; my personal opinion is that they represented an early 20th century paradigm and are outdated.
3) Lol suggesting to change the system of government is silly, but yeah, the government can do a better job securing the border.
4) Confess! XD lol just kidding.
5) I don’t need to write about generalizing. I’m sure we both heard it all before. That being said, if white on black crime is called a hate crime, it should be the same for black on white crime.
6) Increase the cost of labor, and you guarantee more American jobs go to the third world. If an American worker costs $10/hour minimum, hypothetically, and a Chinese worker $1/hour & plus a dollar or two to ship manufactured products from China to the USA, what are companies going to do?
Increase the cost of labor, and you guarantee more American jobs go to the third world. If an American worker costs $10/hour minimum, hypothetically, and a Chinese worker $1/hour & plus a dollar or two to ship manufactured products from China to the USA, what are companies going to do?
I don’t claim to be economically literate, but I suspect many free-trade ideologists are economically illiterate too so I’m probably in good company.
That said, I think the way to handle this is economic nationalism. If companies send jobs overseas, they should have their access to American customers restricted in direct proportion. Why should they get to compete on an otherwise level playing field with American companies if they aren’t doing as much for American workers (and by extension, America)?
Would free-trade and open-borders states gain a short-term advantage over us if we did this? Yes. Would it last? Maybe, if they have it in their nature to be overlords, as the Saudis do. We do not have this in our nature, so it would be trying to take advantage of a natural strength that just isn’t there. Those who try this and don’t have this natural strength are committing suicide via race-replacement.
Maybe SJ doesn’t get this, what with his being a Jew and all; Jews, like Saudis, do have that overlord gene.
There should be a distinction between native and foreign companies; the former should have a more favorable environment insofar as the state is concerned, and to qualify, inter alia, a company should have a certain portion of its employees be natives.
HW:
2.) Apparently, the Jews don’t seem to follow their own advice about groupthink. Every year the local Jewish Federations in North America spend billions of dollars on the maintenance of Jewish ethnic identity.
SJ:
2) I never saw any point in any of these organizations; my personal opinion is that they represented an early 20th century paradigm and are outdated.
This is what we call trying to make a dollar out of 15 cents. People with 3-digit IQs understand that it’s completely irrelevant, but SJ omits that part so those with room-temp IQs might not figure it out. They might think there’s some significance to some random Jew’s ostensible opinion.
But it’s roughly as meaningful as a slaveholder (or perhaps more accurately, someone who does brisk business with a slaveholder) saying he thinks the pro-slavery politicians in Congress were pointless and outdated. Whether SJ thinks (or admits) so or not, he’s benefiting from, and contributing to, the power structure in question. He’s hurting us, and helping himself, right now, and has been all his life.
The web of organized American Jewry is hardly pointless or outdated if you’re a Palestinian, or an Israeli; it’s not made pointless or outdated by SJ’s stated opinion. In fact, SJ’s assertion is so useless, it can’t even tell us if SJ actually does think them pointless or outdated.
In short, it’s like pissing down my back and telling me it’s raining. In short, he left the answer to #2 blank.
SJ, by whatever mechanism, Japan and Israel are modern First-World states with modern economies engaged in plenty of foreign trade, and so forth, that aren’t race-replacing themselves with Negroes as the U.S. Jews are helping force the U.S. to do. Israel in fact is a Jewish national socialist apartheid state and getting away with it. So it certainly can be done. U.S. whites need to start doing the same as Israel and Japan. Save the Economics 101 details for the next textbook you write, they’re not relevant because we have only to open our eyes and look around to see countries that are doing fine in today’s economy without race-replacing themselves.
And homogeneous China and Japan have the second and third largest Global economies, respectively. With increasing racial diversity, the US and leading European countries have rapidly shrinking economies.
>> They might think there’s some significance to some random Jew’s ostensible opinion.
Svigor all that is going to happen is that I’m going to repeat myself about diversity in thought amongst jews and then someone may be like OMG SJ is repeating himself; so let’s not and pretend that we did. XD
By the way do you really think that I’m the only jew who thinks that all these orgs are pointless? Your post Svigor is basically conspiratorial thinking.
Fred, Israel’s arab citizens have free speech and the right to vote. In most arab countries arabs do not have free speech, nor the right to vote. I hope you don’t mind me not answering the rest of your post because it would appear repetitive.
“Fred, Israel’s arab citizens have free speech and the right to vote.” ( — SJ)
Oh? …. So … if non-whites in the U.S. get free speech and the vote and in all other respects get treated the way Israel treats its non-Jews it’s OK? Is that what you’re offering? Deal! I’ll take it! (With that set-up we’ll have race-replacement reversed in five minutes, no problemo.)
Will Abe Foxman & Co. shut up about it too? Otherwise no deal.
lol Fred Israel is actually quite restrained when dealing with the Palestinians. Let em try their suicide bombing stuff with Russia or China and see what happens.
Sure, we all know how Russia crisscrossed their territory with enormous concrete walls right after Beslan.
SJ:”Increase the cost of labor, and you guarantee more American jobs go to the third world. If an American worker costs $10/hour minimum, hypothetically, and a Chinese worker $1/hour & plus a dollar or two to ship manufactured products from China to the USA, what are companies going to do?”
There goes the Jew, always thinking about MONEY before everything else – I bet you are a libertarian, eh? A Randian?
In our White Nationalist Republic, race will always come before money. We will make sure that the owners of major companies and businesses in our White nation are pro-White and pro-nationalistic, that they seek the permanent survival of the White race before they seek to merely fatten their own wallets.
Wages will remain good and solid for the White working classes, who will be protected by a racially nationalistic economy – their bosses will be their fellow Whites who want to see more healthy, smart, and attractive White children born with parents from good honest jobs that pay a humane wage. Workers will be encouraged to rise above the working-class if they have the drive and intelligence to do so.
Organized international-finance Jews and their greedy allies are the people who have outsourced a huge chunk of America’s manufacturing capacity since they disproportionately control many corporations, the stock market, international trade, and so on. Just look at the boards of directors of some of the worst offending companies.
Via outsourcing Jews and their allies gain beau-coup bucks and live the high life (as do their children: afforded the best educations and amenities in a VERY non-diverse environment) from using Asiatic slave labor whilst many working-class Whites are merely ground in to the economic dirt…meanwhile White nations continue to degrade as more and more Whites fall economically behind because of Jew-led outsourcing, and at the same time the nation is flooded with non-White immigrants via policies pushed by Jews and far-leftist race deniers – during all of this the Jews and their allies live in walled off compounds, gated communities, and high-rise apartments far removed from the increasingly degraded rabble around and below them, still reaping the daily profits from the insane greed merely by punching some keys on a computer screen, making a few stock trades a day, investing in bogus financial hpgwash, and continuing to profit from the labor of Asian factory serfs. POOF! A new Brazil is born, and the subverted nation’s racial, cultural, and economic level falls far below where it used to be.
THE JEWS ARE OUR UNDOING
Excellent summary of what’s going on by Zsidozas just above. Nothing about trade or the modern world economy forces race-replacement on any Euro-race country any more than did trade or the economy of any age past. I believe, exactly as Z states above, that the reason Wall Street, Big Business & Industry, and Banks bribe the politicians to look the other way as U.S. jobs are outsourced/offshored and as low-wage non-white workers and employees are imported in the massive volumes we’re seeing to replace white workers and finally race-replace the entire population — the reason this is going on is the high proportion of Jews in decision-making roles in Big Business & Industry, Banking, and Wall Street. Notice Israel, also part of today’s world with its modern economy, jet travel, and economic pressures is not race-replacing its population and doing quite well economically. Ditto Japan. Difference? That’s easy: the difference is hostile Jews aren’t a high percentage of Japan’s Industrial, banking, and stock market honchos, and in Israel’s case the Jews who are aren’t hostile to the surronding national population — in Israel they’re sympathetic to the normal societal goal of putting basics such as ordinary national racial/ethnocultural self-preservation above squeezing every last penny of profit out of this or that then throwing the squeezed-dry husk away like a squeezed orange rind, having transformed it into Brazil. The Jewish industrial and stock market honchos don’t view Israel as prey to be treated like that. So those are the differences that result in Japan (no Jews) and Israel (no hostile Jews) being able to remain nation-states while the U.S. (brimming with hostile Jews in postions of power) gets forced into a Brazil-like transformation.
Fred, get that priceless insight of yours published in book form, pronto hasto!
Svigor all that is going to happen is that I’m going to repeat myself about diversity in thought amongst jews
All you’re doing is arguing by implication for the room-temp IQs. Diversity is not the same as proportionality. Diversity: .1% Jews, .1% blacks, .1% yellows, .1% browns, .1% sepias, 99.5% Euro-Christians, for Harvard enrollment. That’s the kind of “diversity” you’re referring to amongst Jews. It’s a lame argument. People with 3-digit IQs will find your argument about as satisfactory as 99% of Jews would find my proposal for Harvard “diversity” above.
Funny, when SJ refers to “diversity” among Jews he means something more like the Harvard proportions above than he does something like what diversity-mongers want when they demand “diversity.”
By the way do you really think that I’m the only jew who thinks that all these orgs are pointless? Your post Svigor is basically conspiratorial thinking.
No, I’m sure your cousin Ari agrees. Who gives a damn? They’re carrying water for you, whether you dismiss them as “pointless” or not, whether you really mean it or not. Again, the very question of whether you (or cousin Ari, or any other Jew) mean it or not is impossible to determine to any degree.
Israel’s arab citizens have free speech and the right to vote. In most arab countries arabs do not have free speech, nor the right to vote.
I LOVE LOVE LOVE this comparison. It amounts to an admission that Israel is more properly compared to Arab states than European. This kind of argument can only survive (it’s totally ubiquitous Zionist boilerplate, I’ve read it more times than I can count) in a Zionist hothouse. It withers out in the open air.
I agree. Israel is more properly compared to Arab states than to European ones, more third world than first.