Guy White has stepped up to bat and answered the questions I posed in the previous thread. Here are my own answers. Feel free to draw your own conclusions.
1.) Why do we have academic institutions dedicated to the exploration of anti-Semitism, but not Europhobia?
Jews possess enormous wealth, power, and influence. In the mid-twentieth century, Jews became part of the American ruling class, and their narrow ethnic interests (such as fighting anti-Semitism) became reflected in American public discourse. An important corollary of the fight against “anti-Semitism” is the destruction of Gentile ethnic consciousness. Jews recognize that this is an important precursor to anti-Semitism and for that reason use their power and influence to demonize nationalist and populist sentiment in the White electorate.
2.) Why are Jews resented, but not Eskimos?
Jews are resented because of their implacable hostility to White Nationalism. This is a common thread that unites all the mainstream Jewish organizations. Jews are also resented because they are seemingly omnipresent in socially destructive trends and movements. Wherever Gentile culture rots, Jews seem to congregate in unusual numbers.
They aren’t resented because they are successful. In my area, Indians and Pakistanis are notorious for buying up local gas stations and hotels. They are emerging as a “market dominant minority.” Jews, however, don’t really live around here. The Indians and Pakistanis are economically motivated. Their quiet success doesn’t inspire the same resentment because they are not an aggressive minority group trying to ”transform” the culture of their Gentile neighbors.
3.) Why is anti-Semitism socially unacceptable in the mainstream, but Europhobia encouraged?
The Jew Power has created this state of affairs to perpetuate its own existence. Blacks, Asians, Hispanics, women, homosexuals, and workers must be stirred up against Whites to create a Jewish led majority governing coalition. If women, workers, and homosexuals thought of themselves as Whites, they might defect to the other side. If criticism of Jews was socially acceptable, the inordinate privileges that Jews enjoy in American society might garner attention and become a source of resentment.
4.) Why the a priori assumption of Jewish innocence?
Jews don’t want to admit that other groups have legitimate grievances against them. If the reasonableness of their critics was ever acknowledged, well, they might have to alter their behavior in ways they dislike. It might result in pogroms or genocide!
5.) Why is ethnic and racial consciousness verboten among Whites, but acceptable in the Jewish community?
Jews fear 1.) defection to the Gentile world and 2.) a backlash by Gentiles that might sweep away their accumulated wealth, power, and privileges. They spend billions of dollars each year on the Jewish Federations trying to maintain a sense of ethnic solidarity. At the same time, they have a phalanx of organizations dedicated to sniffing out and demonizing the slightest whiff of Gentile racial consciousness.
6.) Why is a border fence a proper remedy for Israel, but not for the United States?
It is “good for the Jews” for Israel to have secure borders and America to have porous ones. If Jews ever got in trouble abroad, it serves their interests to have the U.S. available as a sanctuary. The demographic eclipse of White America could also forestall the rise of an indigenous nativist anti-Semitic party.
7.) Why does the U.S. State Department fight anti-Semitism, but not far more prevelant racial prejudice against Whites?
This is a reflection of the internal balance of power between ethnic groups.
Guy White’s answers to your questions are pitiful.
“Guy White’s answers to your questions are pitiful.” ( — ATBOTL)
I just read them. I agree, they’re absolutely pathetic.
Guy White does nothing but blame the victim. His notion of racial suicide is scientifically ludicrous. Does evolution program us to kill ourselves? No, we’re being manipulated by others pursuing their interests.
he is a jew
Guy White is a fraud and a chump on an ego trip. He denies posts that make him look like a fool, which is quite often.
I don’t believe Spike came to him for an interview.
Does evolution program us to kill ourselves?
Apparently it does. According to your own views other races find white women irresistible. While it is true that the offspring more closely resemble the other race, if the proportion of whites were large enough, the other group would eventually cease to exist, ie ‘suicide.’
I have tried since Saturday 06/02/2010 to post a reply to Guy White’s blog but four times failed to make it through his impervious wall of moderation.
This is remarkable given that he has successively, cajoled all along by his commenters, derided commenters here for not replying to his so called argument.
DK: Wallace’s sycophants have already proclaimed that your answers are pitiful and pathetic.
Unfortunately, they will have to wait until (if?) Wallace himself explains why your answers are pitiful/pathetic to find out why they feel that way.
So here is my first rebuttal posted at his blog:
” why are Jews resented, but not Eskimos;
People hate those close to them and those who are successful.
Thus, in the 80s, the LA Lakers were rivals with the Clippers (their neighbors) and the Boston Celtics (a successful team).
The Eskimos are neither. The Jews are both.
This would have made some sense (perhaps) if written: People hate those other people culturally unlike them, and antithetical to them, who live in close proximity to them. This hatred is exacerbated when the other people encroach upon principles the first group cherish as a cultural principle.
As it is though, the statement is so simplistic it is easily dismissed by noting all those current instances where this doesn’t hold true like Oz and Kiwis, Canadians and Americans, French and Germans etc. These people may have characteristics that they dislike about each other but they don’t “hate” each other.
So strike down this facile argument.
Why do the Iraqi Shi’ites hate the Sunni? Neighbors.
Because of religious differences. Go here and educate yourself.
Why do they hate Americans? They are successful.
Extremely simplistic to the point of willful ignorance.
More likely that a) Islam (both Shia and Sunni) hate all non-muslims, and b) this hate becomes exacerbated by US hegemony throughout the world including Arab and Persian states, c) the US supports Israel, another exacerbating factor.
Why don’t the Shi’ites hate Brazilians or the Zulus? Both are like Eskimos: far away and not successful.
Islam if able to militarily excercise it’s Qur’an inspired desires would invade Brasil and African nations and any Eskimo lands. In fact they do and have invade African nations. This should be common knowledge to someone of your apparent intellect (I’m going on the opinion of others here.)
This has historically been the case since the inception of Islam and was only put into the reverse due to the decline of the Ottoman empire and the preeminence of European world power.
Why didn’t the Lakers hate the Clippers when they were in Buffalo? Again, far away and not successful.
I have no idea but your conclusion is probably just as nonsensical as the others you have already made.
Here is my second comment that was executed at his wall:
Why does the U.S. State Department fight nti-Semitism, but not far more prevelant racial prejudice against Whites?
Because whites accept abuse. If I punch you in the face and you turn the other cheek, I will punch you again.
Really? That’s it? Because whites accept abuse.?
The entire history, ancient and modern, of White warfare amongst themselves and others are examples that whites accept abuse.?
Obviously to any half-whit your first sentence is so wrong it is absurd to the point of intellectual malfeasance.
Your second sentence in rebuttal gives your game away. For you it is the Christian instruction to turn the other cheek that is the cause of our problems. In other words, because we are predominantly Christian.
It would be to your credit if you were to be honest with your arguments rather than cloak them with all your filibustering yabbering.
But to answer your charge, again I point out that the post Roman period of the Christian West has, as one of its defining characteristics, warfare amongst ourselves and others.
Please detail the instances during the Thirty Years’ War or the military career of Cromwell (as but two examples) where you see any instance that Christ’s injunction that we turn the other cheek is accepted as you propose it should be accepted.
And if it cannot be found to hold true as your axiom states it should then you have no argument. These two examples alone negate your statement.
Also, notice that what they said is nothing but a naked conclusion backed by no reason at all. They just stated a conclusion. That’s it.
I can’t say I blame Antimsemitica’s commenters for dismissing your argument out of hand. It is tiresome to argue with such naked absurdities as your supposed argument contains.
I have demonstrated the falsity of two of your arguments. I think you should re-answer them in light of my correction.
Hunter Wallace posts as good a short exposition of the Jewish M.O. as I’ve ever read. On the matter of whites vs. whites in history, yes, we are quite promethean and combative…but I have the impression that a good many of these intra-white wars, revolutions, and massacres (e.g., communism, the 20th century War of Encirclement vs. Germany) were partly or largely (round II, 1939-45 esp.) arranged by organized Jewry for the benefit of organized Jewry.