Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Philo-Semitism’ Category

Chechar has seen the light on the Jewish Question. Lawrence Auster has responded at View From the Right. Like Chechar, I didn’t get the Jewish Question at first. It took me about six months to wrap my mind around the idea that Jews are not the people they present themselves to be. They have mastered the art of public relations. In this respect, White Nationalists have a lot to learn from them.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Guy White has a new post about White Nationalism and anti-Semitism that mentions me and brings up several topics of relevance to this website. As usual, what Guy says contains a grain of truth, but he likes to paint in broad strokes. He also tends to come at White Nationalism from a Jewish perspective.

Here’s my own two cents:

1.) There are White Nationalists who can be clinically diagnosed as psychopaths. They openly proclaim their intention to exterminate the Jews. Unlike Guy White, I am not convinced a majority of White Nationalists (or even a significant minority) share this point of view. In 9 out of 10 cases, it is mere saber rattling and more-radical-than-thou rhetorical posturing. If these people were truly genocidal, they would have the courage to carry out their convictions.

2.) It is equally true that a significant number of Jews are batshit crazy. They are unreachable. These people are driven by an animus against Whites and intend to do us harm. Unlike the WNs, these people often have the wealth, power, or influence to act on their resentments. The death of Howard Zinn a few days ago was a small reminder that such malicious Jews (individual fire starters) are out there.

3.) Yes, it is true that anti-Semites often say stupid things on the internet. I cited that in my first post as one of the reasons why I started this website. There is a world of difference though between powerless commentators on obscure blogs and the harm done to Whites by Jewish organizations like the ADL, AJC, or HIAS who have the ear of Congress and the President of the United States.

4.) There is no valid comparison between radical anti-Semites on fringe rightwing websites and the Jewish political pundits and commentators that dominate mainstream American public discourse. You can’t compare a David Brooks, Paul Krugman, or Jeffrey Goldberg to a WhitePrideWorldWide or HeilHitler 14/88 on VNN Forum.

5.) I’m a reasonable man. If Jews changed their behavior, I wouldn’t have a problem with them. I don’t write about Eskimos because they mind their own business and have never attempted to “transform”  the culture and racial attitudes of White Americans. We don’t write about the Amish, Navajo, Shakers, Sioux or countless other American minority groups for the same reason.

6.) Jews are resented because of their actions. Over the past two months, I have monitored them on this website. We’ve seen Jews try to manhandle the Pope, censor racialists at C-SPAN, push Obamacare through Congress, poison German youth with hip hop music, align with Hispanics to push “comprehensive immigration reform,” peddle anti-racist intrepretations of American history, demonize Whites on MLK day, demonize Sarah Palin, censor comments at The Huff Post, open our borders to a tidal wave of Haitian immigrants, etc.

7.) I totally reject the victimization theory. Jews have never been victimized in the United States. I can’t think of a single anti-Jewish federal, state, or local law ever passed in America since the ratification of the Constitution. In theory, we shouldn’t have a Jewish problem. Jews were welcomed to America with open arms and have been wildly successful here. They have absolutely no valid reason to hate this country or wish to displace its people. Yet we still have Jews like Howard Zinn.

8.) White Nationalism emerged in the mid-1970s in reaction to the demise of the Jim Crow South. Historically speaking, American racialism hasn’t been anti-Semitic. That changed in the wake of the Civil Rights Movement when the extent of Jewish involvement in pushing anti-racism and integration became unmistakably clear.

9.) White Americans are the victims, not Jews. Thousands of Americans lost their lives in the Second World War fighting Hitler’s armies. White Americans liberated the Jews from the Third Reich.

How did they repay us? By marching across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma with MLK, redefining America as a “nation of immigrants,” fomenting Communism, destroying racial theory, opening our borders to a tidal wave of Third World immigration, demonizing White racial consciousness, and so on. We’ve given Israel literally billions of dollars in tribute.

In return for what? Nothing but hatred and contempt for “White racism.” Ever more obscene and radical demands to purge our heritage of anything that smacks of whiteness. American Jews are the most ungrateful people who have ever lived. They have made themselves at home in our house, a nation created by Whites for Whites, and libel us as moral lepers!

10.) Why on Earth should White Nationalists like the Jews? No people in the world have done us more harm or loathe us with more malice. This was the case even before White Nationalism existed. Irrational WNs blame the Jews for everything that is wrong with America because of the Jewish omnipresence in almost every degenerate cultural trend.

The worst Jews can say about White Nationalists is that they have been the victims of some unkind comments by anonymous posters on the internet. That is nothing compared to the real harm that Jews inflict upon Whites on a daily basis which we are chronicling here.

Read Full Post »

Guy White has launched one of his periodic rockets into the anti-Semitic camp. I see that he has anticipated my response. Essentially, he collects a number of straw man arguments and proceeds to shoot fish in a barrel. He takes the weakest claims of his opposition and uses them to present a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented characterization of anti-Semitism. I could easily do this with absurd philo-Semitic commentators, but that would only be equally illogical.

The philo-Semites make one substantial point when they argue that the anti-Semitic blogosphere (and online community) is larded with absurd conspiracy theories, unsourced claims, weak arguments, a Neo-Nazi infection and general paranoia, but they draw the wrong conclusions. Sites like Jew Watch and Judicial Inc hardly lend credibility to the anti-Semitic cause. This is an argument for a better, more powerful designer version of anti-Semitism that doesn’t suffer from the same flaws.

A similar argument could be made against racialism. There are various absurd racist claims floating around out there: the Ancient Egyptians were Nordics, Whites are the founders of all known civilizations, a vertical hierarchy of races exist with Nordics on top, racial categories are immutable, all blacks are criminals, non-Whites have made no contributions to scientific and technological progress, intelligence is entirely hereditary, and so on. Catch my drift? The anti-racists use the same fodder in their propaganda, but reasonable people (those with a background in elementary logic) can discern that it is not an argument against, say, HBD or genomics informed race realism.

I’ve yet to meet a philo-Semite that argues in good faith. There is always some trick, some sleight of hand to their arguments. Mendacity is to philo-Semitism what paranoia is to the anti-Semitic fringe.

Read Full Post »

Ted Sallis has been “knocked off the fence” by the mendacity of philo-Semites such as Guy White, Ian Jobling, and Iceman. Previously, he has argued that Jews are not a European ethnic group like the Germans or Italians. The latest fracas involves an assault on Salterism. The aggressive push by philo-Semites to sandbox the Jewish Question at all costs is having a positive effect on the anti-Semitic blogosphere.

Ian Jobling’s pet cause of the moment is refounding the pro-White movement on the solid ground of Rawlsian liberalism. Nevermind the fact that Rawlsian liberalism justifies anti-racism, forced integration, welfare, affirmative action, third world immigration, hate crime laws, hate speech laws, and outlawing pro-White political parties. Jobling promises there is gold in this manure. His criticism of Salterism should be seen in this context.

Update: Ted Sallis has responded to Ian Jobling.

Read Full Post »